![]() |
![]() |
|
|
SUBSCRIBE
The leading Copyright |
Wishful Thinking On Immigration And Crime - CIS Report Attempts To Erase 100 Years Of Databy Benjamin E. Johnson et. al of Immigration Policy CenterWashington D.C. - A new report from the restrictionist group, Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), Immigration and Crime: Assessing a Conflicted Issue, attempts to overturn a century's worth of research which has demonstrated repeatedly that immigrants are less likely than the native-born to commit violent crimes or end up behind bars. The CIS report focuses much of its attention on questioning the accuracy of the 2000 Census data used in two studies in particular: The Myth of Immigrant Criminality and the Paradox of Assimilation, published by the Immigration Policy Center (IPC) in 2007, and Crime, Corrections, and California: What Does Immigration Have to Do with It?, published by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) in 2008. However, CIS ignores not only the many other sources of data in these two studies, but the myriad studies from other researchers which have reached the same conclusion. CIS's real agenda appears to be to promote the 287(g) and Secure Communities programs, which - while purporting to identify and capture "criminal aliens"- are actually identifying many individuals who are not criminals, or even immigrants. In fact, recent Secure Communities data shows over 4,000 U.S. citizens who received "hits" through the program. There are many problems with the data from both of these programs, which CIS cites extensively to make its case. Localities with 287(g)'s are a self-selected group, and their data is not representative of the entire country. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) testified in March 2009 that 287(g) has been poorly managed, and that the data which participating agencies are to track and report to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has not been defined. As a result, there is no consistency in the reporting of data. Secure Communities is an even smaller program with a similarly problematic data and reporting system.Leaving aside the
technical (and highly debatable) claims which CIS makes about the
accuracy of 2000 Census data, the fact remains that the evidence
demonstrating relatively low rates of criminality and incarceration
among immigrants comes from far more sources than just the decennial
census. It also comes from the National Crime Victimization Survey
(NCVS), the Immigration and Intergenerational Mobility in
Metropolitan Los Angeles (IIMMLA) survey, the Children of Immigrants
Longitudinal Study (CILS), the National Longitudinal Study of
Adolescent Health (Add Health), and in-depth community-based studies
in cities such as Chicago, San Diego, El Paso, and
Miami.
Moreover, it is not
simply the IPC and PPIC which have drawn upon these many sources of
data in concluding that immigration is not associated with higher
rates of crime or imprisonment. Consider the following three recent
examples:
In other words, numerous researchers drawing upon numerous sources of data have reached the same conclusion that the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform reached in its 1984 report - which also happens to be the conclusion reached by the Industrial Commission of 1901, the Dillingham Immigration Commission of 1911, and the Wickersham National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement of 1931: that immigration is not associated with higher crime.
About The Author |