ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Find a Lawyer                         More Options

State:

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Classifieds

RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Find a lawyer

Seminars

Immigration books

Advertise

Resources

Blogs

About ILW.COM

Link to us


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Share this page

Bookmark this page

Print this page

del.icio.us Add to del.icio.us

Find a Lawyer
State:

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
© 1995-2008
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 17000+ readers
Enter your email address here:

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily                        < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly 

Dear Editor:

I am an immigration attorney in Minneapolis, and I normally find your daily email report useful. However, your comments for November 16, 2000 are simply baffling. ILW bills itself as being pretty pro-immigrant, yet your commentary finds fault with Congress for "micro-managing immigration law" and giving "creative lawyers new loopholes."

Excuse me, but would you rather see Congress do nothing, and allow H-1B immigrants to languish in limbo while the INS takes several months to adjucate H-1B petitions, and years to adjudicate permanent residence applications? AC21 was a positive step towards fairness for employment-based immigrants, yet you would rather that Congress take a "hands-off" policy towards the INS and let them do whatever they want, whenever they want. Who's side are you on?

Dinesh Shenoy


Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 17000+ readers
Enter your email address here:

Search for:          Advanced search