ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Find a Lawyer                         More Options

State:

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Classifieds

RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Find a lawyer

Seminars

Immigration books

Advertise

Resources

Blogs

About ILW.COM

Link to us


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Share this page

Bookmark this page

Print this page

del.icio.us Add to del.icio.us

Find a Lawyer
State:

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:

In his letter to the editor Mr. Delgado suggests that extension of 245(i) does not harm national security because it still requires background checks of the illegal aliens who apply. What he fails to consider is that organizations which do the background checks, such as the FBI, have limited resources. Are we to divert these resources from national security matters -- or the background checks for legal immigrants -- in order to legalize millions of illegal immigrants?

The reason for a legal immigration process is to have an orderly and fair method of admitting immigrants. No matter how you cut it, illegal immigration disrupts this and patchwork attempts to "fix" it, such as 245(i), only result in additional problems.

MA

Copyright © 2001 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM


Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:

Search for:          Advanced search