![]() |
![]() |
|
|
SUBSCRIBE The leading Copyright |
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Commission Rescinds Prior Guidance, Issues Charge Processing Instructions WASHINGTON - The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) today
reaffirmed that the Supreme Court's decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National
Labor Relations Board, 122 S. Ct. 1275 (2002), does not affect the government's ability to root out
discrimination against undocumented workers. Federal law makes it illegal to discriminate against
any worker in the United States, regardless of immigration status. In response to Hoffman, the
EEOC recently directed its field offices that claims for all forms of relief, other than reinstatement
and back pay for periods after discharge or failure to hire, should be processed in accord with
existing standards, without regard to an individual's immigration status. "The Commission appreciates concerns raised by stakeholders in recent weeks about the
effect of Hoffman on our enforcement efforts," said EEOC Chair Cari M. Dominguez. "Protecting
immigrant workers from illegal discrimination has been, and will continue to be, a priority for the
EEOC. This Agency will vigorously pursue claims of discrimination against all workers covered
by our laws." Chair Dominguez also stressed that the Agency will continue to work proactively with
community groups to prevent discrimination against immigrant workers. At the same time, the Commission also voted unanimously to rescind its 1999 Guidance on
"Remedies Available to Undocumented Workers Under Federal Employment Discrimination Laws"
an action necessitated by the Hoffman decision. The Supreme Court in Hoffman held that federal
immigration policy precludes an award of backpay to an undocumented worker under the National
Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Commission's 1999 Guidance had relied extensively on pre-
Hoffman NLRA case law to permit post-termination backpay awards under the laws enforced by the
Agency. The rescission notice states that the EEOC will seek appropriate relief consistent with
the Supreme Court's ruling in Hoffman, but will not, on its own initiative, inquire into a
worker's immigration status or consider an individual's immigration status when examining
the underlying merits of a charge. Commissioner Leslie E. Silverman noted: "By this action, the Commission recognizes
that the Hoffman decision required our Agency to step back and re-examine our policy on
remedies for undocumented workers. While Hoffman affects the availability of some forms
of relief to undocumented workers, make no mistake, it is still illegal for employers to
discriminate against undocumented workers." Vice Chair Paul M. Igasaki said: "The Commission's commitment three years ago to
protect the rights of all workers, regardless of immigration status, is not altered by this action.
While the Supreme Court's decision in Hoffman may affect a person's eligibility to receive
some forms of relief once a violation is established, immigration status remains irrelevant to
the EEOC when examining the underlying merits of the charge." The full text of the rescission, as well as other information about the EEOC, is
available on the agency's web site at www.eeoc.gov. In addition to enforcing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits
employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin; the EEOC
enforces the employment provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits
employment discrimination against people with disabilities in the private sector and state and
local governments; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act; the Equal Pay Act; the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973's prohibitions against disability discrimination in the federal
government; and sections of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. Share this page | Bookmark this page | Print this page | The leading immigration law publisher - over 50000 pages of free information!
© Copyright 1995-2008 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM |