Dear Editor:
It is to be expected that the ultra-liberal Los
Angeles Times, which is so terrified of Arnold
Schwarzenegger's candidacy, would publish almost daily
hit pieces about Arnold such as the alleged visa
violation in 1971. But when an immigration lawyer
like Greg Siskind repeats the piece in his newsletter,
http://www.visalaw.com/03sep4/15sep403.html, it's the
height of hypocrisy. The Democrats are the ones (which I suspect the majority of the immigration bar, certainly AILA,
supports) who are giving illegals in California driver's licenses and free college tuition. And they're worried about some obscure alleged and iffy violation of a guy a generation ago?
Just unbelievable. Furthermore, I thought immigration lawyers
are supposed to be helping immigrants to adjust their
status to permanent residence through section 245(i), which forgives most such nonimmigrant visa violations.
Who knows when Arnold got his green card but if the
alleged visa violation had been an issue at his
adjustment interview, it was surely dealt with by his immigration lawyer at the time.
I also suspect that it's because Arnold
is a white European immigrant, that the LA Times and
their lackeys are concerned about this phony
immigration issue. If he were a Latino candidate like
Bustamente, they wouldn't have brought this up. Now that the en banc 9th Circuit has
resoundingly allowed the recall to go forward again, I say to the LA Times and the other publications to get
out of the way of the recall and Arnold. P.S. By the way, why don't you preserve the letter
writers' paragraphs. It's extremely burdensome and tiring to read the long letters as one paragraph. Your newsletter is full of paragraph spacings itself. Do the letters' paragraphs impinge upon your publishing software?
Michael D.
Editor's Note: Please see Editor's comments above.
Share this page
|
Bookmark this page
The leading immigration law publisher - over 50000 pages of free information!
© Copyright 1995- American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM
|
