ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Classifieds

RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Find a lawyer

CLE Seminars

Immigration books

Advertise

Services 4 LawFirms

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

SpeedyScanning

EB-5

Buy/Sell Law Firms

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Find a Lawyer
State:

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:
EImmigration: Create & Manage Unlimited Forms & Cases, starting at $40/mo

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
My letter to the Editor as published last Friday said, "Also, just to be clear, visa overstays are not eligible for adjustment under 245(i). And, if they marry a US citizen, they could and still can adjust under 245(i). 245(i) generally covered (immigration lawyers, please correct me if I'm wrong) only those who entered illegally." The letter as I sent it said "they could and still can adjust under 245(a)", not 245(i) that your editing changed it to. As far as I am aware 245(a) is a separate section of the law which did not expire, and which does allow those who enter legally to adjust status if they marry a US citizen even if they overstay. Or am I in error?

Ali Alexander

Editor's Note: We apologize for the error. Your letter has been updated to reflect the correction.



Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: