Facilitating The Exchange Of Information
A letter to the Editor today asks us if we can moderate content for our
discussion board to improve the quality of the discussion on the board. We
have often said that ILW.COM is a facilitator for the exchange of
information about immigration law. The discussion board, our chat room,
this periodical, and other parts of our site are different ways in which we
facilitate the exchange of information. While we believe, and your comments
to us show, that we are doing a good job in the main, we are always looking
for ways to improve what we do. We welcome our reader's suggestions on how
we might better facilitate the exchange of information for the immigration
law community. Please send your thoughts to: email@example.com.
200,000 Attorney Searches per Year!
Approximately 200,000 searches are made each year for immigration attorneys on ILW.COM. That's almost 400 searches per year per attorney listed in our lawyer directory. Which means that if you are listed with ILW.COM, then your listing will be searched once each day throughout the year. You need only one client a year to make a profit on your listing! For a personal discussion on listing your practice in our directory, please send an e-mail with your phone number to firstname.lastname@example.org. Alternatively, if you prefer to list yourself on-line, please click here: http://www.ilw.com/membership/.
Foreign Visitors Overloading U.S. Hospitals
Jose Latour writes about the impact that uninsured
foreign nationals are having on US hospitals, particularly in Florida and other high-immigration states.
Keep on top of the latest in immigration law! Attend ILW.COM seminars! You can attend ILW.COM phone seminars from the convenience of your office! For more info on the seminars currently available, please click here: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/
Immigration Law News
Commission On Civil Rights Announces Meeting To Plan Southwest Federal Immigration Law Enforcement Report
The Commission on Civil Rights will convene a meeting to plan a follow-up to the 1997 report on civil rights problems along the US/Mexico border. The report is: Federal Immigration Law Enforcement in the Southwest: Civil Rights Impacts on Border Communities.
DOL Approves Consent Findings Of $36,000 Penalty In A H-1A Nursing Case
In the Matter of Administrator Wage & Hour Division v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc., No. 1998-ARN-0003 (OALJ, Jan. 29, 2003), the Office of Administrative Law Judges approved consent findings which required a penalty of $36,000 to be paid by the Employer to the DOL in a H-1A nursing case.
DOS Closes Nuevo Laredo US Consulate Under Allegations Of Illegal Visa Issuance
The Department of State Spokesman Boucher announced during a press briefing that the US consulate in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico had been closed in order to conduct a thorough investigation of its consulate visa operations in response to allegations that it had issued a number of individuals illegal visas.
DOS States Aliens Of Foreign Terrorist Organizations Are Inadmissible And/Or Removable From US
The Department of State issued a foreign terrorist organization (FTO) fact sheet clarifying the legal ramifications of such a designation. It stated that representatives and members of a designated FTO, if they are aliens, are inadmissible to and, in certain circumstances, removable from the US.
President Bush Announces His Intention To Nominate Garcia As Assistant Secretary Of Border & Transportation Security
President Bush announced in a press statement that he intends to nominate Michael J. Garcia of New York, to an Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Border & Transportation Security). Mr. Garcia is currently the Acting Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization at the Department of Justice.
Alien's Disappearance Causes Fugitive Disentitlement
In Antonio-Martinez v. INS, No. 90-70474 (9th Cir. Jan. 30, 2003), the court found that the Petitioner's disappearance while his petition for review of a deportation order was pending, subjected him to fugitive disentitlement.
Sentence Imposed On Revocation Is Not Sentence Probated
In US v. Compian-Torres, No. 02-50211 (5th Cir. Jan. 29, 2003), held that a sentence imposed on revocation is actually imposed as described in the Sentencing Guidelines and not probated as excepted in the Commentary to the Guidelines.
No Abuse Of Discretion By BIA
In Omolewa v. INS, No. 02-1758 (4th Cir. Jan. 29, 2003), the court said that there was no abuse of discretion in the Board of Immigration Appeal's decision.
30-Day Appeal Period Tolls From Date Of Final Order Not From Date Of Service
In Nahatchevska v. Ashcroft, No. 02-9593 (10th Cir. Jan. 29, 2003), the court held that the 30-day time period for appeal is "after the date of the final order of removal" and not "30 days after service of that order upon the parties".
Motion Introducing New Evidence To Support New Ground For Relief Can Be Properly Construed As An Independent Motion To Reopen
In Guzman v. INS, No. 01-71717 (9th Cir. Jan. 29, 2003), the court found that Petitioner's motion to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to remand to the Immigration Judge in order to apply for adjustment of status under 245(i) (after his deportation order had become final) was properly construed by the BIA as a motion to reopen.
Deportation Creates Disincentive To Register In NSEERS
An opinion column distributed by UPI says "Immigrants from 24  countries
have been ordered to re-register with the [INS] as part of NSEERS; anyone
who complies and is found to have major or minor visa violations will be
deemed out of status, likely detained and deported. Aside from creating a
disincentive to re-register, the program's implementation has created
Atty. Gen. Embarrassed At Registration Violation Of Prominent Journalist
The Santa Fe New Mexican reports that at a meeting with the Pakistani
Foreign Minister, Attorney General Ashcroft was embarrassed at the
recounting of a NSEERS violation for a prominent journalist from Pakistan.
NSEERS Funding Cut-Off A Mistake By Sen. Kyl
The Washington Times reports "A spokesman for [Sen.] Kyl said the senator's
focus in the amendment was to ensure there was sufficient funding for the
broader tracking program and that the funding for the system was mistakenly
cut off in the amendment."
Attorney listings on ILW.COM are searched 200,000 times/year! Each attorney listed is searched an average of once each day! Just one new client will pay for the entire year's fee! Click here for more info: http://www.ilw.com/membership/
Help Wanted - Experienced Immigration Attorney
Well-established mid-sized downtown NYC law firm seeks Experienced Immigration Attorney specializing in employment-based immigration work, including preparation of nonimmigrant visa petitions and labor certifications. Immigration litigation experience a plus. Please e-mail resume to: email@example.com (Salary requirements must be included).
We carry advertisements for Help Wanted: Attorney, Help Wanted: Paralegal, Help Wanted: Other, Positions Sought, Products & Services Offered, etc.
For information on advertising in the classifieds please click here
For a listing of current immigration events please click here
For services/products of use in your law practice please click here
Letters to the Editor
I went to the lawyers discussion board and discovered a useless mess: letters designed to make everyone hate Jews, uninformed haranguing, and good advice that is so buried in useless or wrong advice that there was no way to know the difference.
My question is can anything be done to make this discussion board work? There is a board for immigrants and employers, so people can have their say there. Is there any for ILW.COM to limit use of the lawyers board, edit content, etc. without creating more trouble for itself than it is worth.
Editor's Note: Please see today's Editor's comments above.
I wanted to give you a couple links to the Federal Register. In the January 24, 2003, issue of the Federal Register (http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a030124c.html), the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) released a final rule that allows them to notify the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of anyone that the TSA has determined poses a threat to transportation security. That notice permits the FAA to immediately suspend, revoke, or refuse to issue an airman certificate of anyone named by the TSA. (http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-1681.htm). That means anybody certified by the FAA which includes mechanics, flight attendants, dispatchers, air-traffic controllers, and pilots.
There are two separate appeal processes for US Citizens and Aliens. The alien process is more lax than the US Citizen one.
See US Citizens version at ( http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-1682.htm )
See Alien version at ( http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-1683.htm )
Both versions allow the TSA to use Classified or Sensitive information to come to their conclusion, which of course, can not be disclosed to the person being designated as a security risk or their counsel. The procedure in both US citizen and alien cases allows for some process but in my opinion falls well short of current standards of procedural due process. (I am still researching the procedural due process and equal protection aspects of the new rule.) This process also stays inside the executive branch without any judicial branch intervention. This also is the first time that the US Government is allowed to use secret evidence against a US citizen I believe. The comment period is open to March 25, 2003.
Jeremy T. Browner
And why are the banks Dr. Baer speaks of apparently willing to do this
without themselves being lobbied by Mexico? Because the Mexican consuls
already successfully lobbied a number of the largest banks and immigrant
heavy cities, and are using that to get others on board. Mexico's stated
aim is to "eat the elephant" one piece at a time, i.e. get amnesty by
getting local acceptance of their ID. The consuls and President Fox have
made no secret of their activities and why they're doing them--why should
Dr. Baer object to calling them what they are, lobbying?
The fact is, our immigration policy is already run by vested interests:
agribusiness, ethnic political groups, labor unions, and now foreign
governments, who want remittances and power over our foreign policy, and
banks, who see a tremendous market in banking the unbanked, largely illegal
immigrants. I can't help wonder when the safety and well-being of the
American people are going to be the first priority in setting immigration
policy--not somebody's bottom line.
Chucky's letter to the Editor on 1/29 betrays an ignorance which is inappropriate on such an enlightened website.
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice.
Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a
qualified attorney. Send Correspondence and articles to firstname.lastname@example.org. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. Opinions expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.