Why The Law Should Be Broken
The very existence of the Family-Based "2A" quota cruelly breaks-up nuclear
families. The spouses and young children (under 21) of permanent residents
are heartlessly separated due to the very concept of this quota. The
spouses and children of US citizens are treated completely differently -
these are subject to no quota. What moral basis exists to treat nuclear
families differently? Is the bond between a husband and wife, or between
parent and child, any different when seen in US citizens or green card
holders? It would be better to not give someone a green card at all, then
to force him/her to live away from his/her near and dear ones.
Anti-immigrationists are united in insisting on the sacredness of the rule
of the law in the field of immigration. They insist that those who break
immigration laws are, by that very fact, not worthy of becoming Americans.
Insofar as this applies to those callously separated by the barbarism of
the FB-2A quota, we say - Phooey. It would be more than understandable if
the spouse and young children of a green-card holder overstayed their visas
and became "illegal", or even entered illegally - it would be an entirely
moral thing to do. Those who believe that spouses should live apart, or
that young children should spend years away from their father or mother,
just because a wicked Congress made an arbitrary law, have a warped view of
human nature. If they truly believed that the majesty of the law should be
upheld, they should support the abolishing of the FB-2A quota, since this
inhuman quota undermines any respect for immigration law. As to the point
about the worthiness of law-breakers to become Americans, the
anti-immigrationists would be on sounder ground arguing that those who
choose to *follow* the law and agree to live apart from their spouse and
young children, are not worthy of being Americans.
The pro-immigrationists are largely complicit in this immorality. Advocates
on the Hill are preparing for a major H-1B battle later this year. If the
choice is between the FB-2A concept, or the H visa, we say abolish the H.
We yield to no one in valuing the immense contribution of immigration to
the American economy. But no amount of money is worth condoning the
abomination which is the separation of nuclear families.
Pro-immigrationists can find no worthier cause than in insisting on not
fair, but simply human treatment for the spouses and young children of
green card holders.
Ultimately, the fault - and the choice - is with Congress. Every American
who represents their constituents in Congress needs to ask himself or
herself - is their any basis to giving an alien a green card, and tell
him/her - leave your spouse and young children behind for years? Is this
American? Is this even human? The ball is in Congress's court.
Missed ILW.COM Seminars? Order Tapes!
Attorneys, paralegals and immigration professionals! You can listen to
cutting edge issues in immigration at a schedule convenient to you. Tapes
for all our seminar series can now be ordered for $199 per series. These
seminars feature experts in the field such as Ron Klasko, Angelo Paparelli,
Joel Stewart, Bernard Wolfsdorf and many others. To read detailed
curricula, speaker bios and other information about all our seminars,
please click here.
Race, Nationality, and Reality: INS Administration of Racial Provisions in US Immigration and Nationality Law Since 1898, Part 7 of 8A Legal Guide For Detainees: Actions Brought Against INS Or Other Law Enforcement Officials For Personal Injury Or Property Damage or Loss: Finale
Marian L. Smith writes "The evidence that INS administrators were dissatisfied with the agency's racial classification systems, shown by the revision of naturalization forms and elimination of Hebrew from the List of Races or Peoples, makes another INS decision of the time appear even more curious."
The Commission on Immigration Practice, Policy, and Pro Bono of the American Bar Association offers a detailed guide (105 pps.) at how to bring actions against INS for personal injury or property damage. This is a compilation of the (3) articles in the series that originally appeared in each Monday's issue beginning in the May 12, 2003 issue of Immigration Daily.
Keep on top of the latest in immigration law! Attend ILW.COM seminars! You can attend ILW.COM phone seminars from the convenience of your office! For more info on the seminars currently available, please click here: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/
Immigration Law News
DOS Adds INTELSAT To International Organization Definition For INA Purposes
The Department of State makes final, effective May 30, 2003, the interim rule, which added INTELSAT (following
privatization) to the regulatory definition of "international organization", but only for purposes of the Immigration and
Nationality Act. The rule also clarifies the status of the organization and the personnel affected.
Petitioner's Claim Does Not Survive Demore v. Kim
In Aikens v. Reno, No. 02-2534 (2nd Cir. May 29, 2003), the court said that it found no merit in Petitioner's claim because the Supreme Court's recent decision in Demore v. Kim held that the detention of "a criminal alien who has conceded that he was deportable, for the limited period of his removal proceedings," was constitutional.
2nd Circuit Remands In Light Of Demore v. Kim
In Zgombic v. Farquharson, No. 00-6165 (2nd Cir. May 29, 2003), the court remanded the case to the district court for consideration of the facts of this case in the light of the recent Supreme Court decision of Demore v. Kim.
63,000 H-2B Visas Issued Last Year
The Philadelphia Inquirer reports "Foreign workers are landing seasonal jobs in affluent US suburbs in unprecedented numbers, thanks to a little-known visa program that is ballooning to serve a booming suburban industry: landscaping."
Federal Court Indicts Two In Marriage Fraud Scheme
New York Newsday reports "Two California men are accused of running an immigration scam by arranging fraudulent marriages in Cambodia."
Attorney listings on ILW.COM are searched 200,000 times/year! Each attorney listed is searched an average of once each day! Just one new client will pay for the entire year's fee! Click here for more info: http://www.ilw.com/membership/
Help Wanted: Experienced Immigration Attorney/Manager
The pioneer in the processing of immigration applications online is searching for an experienced immigration attorney to manage the legal staff of our fast-growing company. Based in Chicago, you will direct and coordinate the activities of our legal services department, which serves hundreds of high-profile companies throughout the US. We are looking for someone who strives to always provide top-tier legal advice and a high level of customer service, and understands the role that technology plays in delivering both. This is a unique high-growth opportunity to work with the latest immigration technology in a forward-thinking, fast-paced environment. 5+ years of business immigration and 2+ years of team management experience required. Please send resume/inquiries to firstname.lastname@example.org. No phone calls, please. EOE.
Help Wanted - Experienced Immigration Attorneys
Are you looking to join a fast-paced, dynamic and friendly team that provides first-rate immigration legal services to global businesses and individuals? Paparelli & Partners LLP, a leading immigration law firm with an established national practice, has immediate openings for two experienced Immigration Lawyers to work at its office in Irvine, California. If you have what it takes, you will work with multinational companies and high-achiever individuals to perform the full range of immigration legal services for employment-based and family-based immigration clients. You will use computer software extensively (research databases, Internet, MS Word, MS Outlook, Excel, ProLaw, Power Point, etc.), and become immersed in cutting-edge immigration law issues. Please contact us if you are a multi-talented multi-tasker, detail oriented, express yourself well in person and on paper, work well as part of a team, love challenges, are willing to work hard, have a spotless ethical record and character, are admitted to practice law in California or another state and have up to three years of U.S. immigration law experience. One of the two positions requires reasonable fluency in Japanese. If you'd like to pursue this exciting opportunity, fax or email your resume + cover letter to Chris McCoy at 949-955-5599 or e-mail her at email@example.com. For background, see our web site: www.entertheusa.com. No phone calls please.
Law Practice For Sale
Are you a well-established mid-sized/large reputable immigration law firm? Do you want to take your practice to the next level? Does the idea of expanding your practice to more than one city stop you in your tracks? Then, read further - this may be opportunity knocking at your door. A highly regarded mid-sized employment-based immigration boutique in a major metropolitan city is for sale, with $1M+ gross revenues and a 12+ staff of lawyers and paralegals. Firm has a good reputation and excellent client service practices. Health reasons are causing Principal to retire in a few years. Principal would like to stay on as rain-maker over a mutually agreed transition period. Interested law firms should send inquiries to firstname.lastname@example.org. All correspondence will be treated as strictly confidential.
We carry advertisements for Help Wanted: Attorney, Help Wanted: Paralegal, Help Wanted: Other, Positions Sought, Products & Services Offered, etc.
For information on advertising in the classifieds please click here
For a listing of current immigration events please click here
For services/products of use in your law practice please click here
Letters to the Editor
In response to a letter to the Editor who likened a "immigrant" to a fellow going to his "neighbour's" farm because the "immigrant's" farm could not support him, let's take this a bit further.
Suppose the neighbour never really owned the land he farms on. Suppose he found the riches on the land already held by an original owner and occupier. Suppose the neighbour then subdued the original owner and assumed ownership of the inherently rich land. Suppose the neighbour with the help of new neighbours developed and enhanced the riches of the land and made it the envy of all. Suppose while doing that, the neighbour took children of the immgrant to till the land and pick the fruits, and build the dames and cities. Suppose the neighbour also coverted the immigrants inherent riches to develop the neighbour's land also. Suppose the neighbour also allowed members of the Immigrant's children keep stolen money from the immigrant in the farm to be used to develop the farm.
Now will it still be that bad if some later immigrant's children left the land depleted partly by actions of the neighbour to make a better life in the Neighbour's "farm". These new immigrant's children hold no grudge but just want the opportunity to culviate a piece of the neighbour's farm while paying taxes to the neigbour which in turn helps develop and expand the neigbour's farm.
Let the previous reader search his conscience. By the way, the writers ancestors "were" the children of the immigrant. So he should stop thinking like the neighbour.
What is truly amazing about yesterday's Name Not Supplied letter is how many falsehoods and misleading comments can be packed into a short
letter. No limited immigration advocate has ever endorsed "death" for border crossing. They have properly pointed the responsibility for such tragedies towards those who encourage, promote and create the conditions
that bring them here. As "invasion" is defined as "an intrusion or
infringement", nothing could more accurately describe the mass, illegal
phenomenon, just as illegal alien is the correct description of those
invaders, rather than apologists' misleading and often used
"undocumented workers". And contrary to comment, polls show that most
Americans desire less immigration. Earlier immigration cannot be
compared with radical changes that have taken place since President
Johnson's 1965 Immigration Reform Act which overturned traditional
immigration policy and replaced it with the most liberal, "easy access"
policies in history. As a result, about one million legal immigrants
come each year, plus unknown, but large, numbers of illegals radically
changing America in numerous, profound ways. It is even more ridiculous
to attempt a comparison between early Indians and todays complex,
evolved society and to characterize citizens as squatters. Americans
have every right to restrict and control entry as all nations do,
includng Mexico. Such illogical comments can only be made from a
position of complete denial of reality or intentional deception and/or
myopic self interest.
R. L. Ranger
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice.
Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a
qualified attorney. Send Correspondence and articles to email@example.com. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. Opinions expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.