ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.


Immigration Daily December 9, 2003
Previous Issues
The unmatched news resource for legal professionals. Free! Join 9000+ readers


Editor's Comments

Courts Want Statistics Before Striking AWO Down

Today's Court of Appeals case centers on the issue of the affirmance without opinion procedure, this time in the 6th Circuit. The American Immigration Law Foundation, in its amicus curiae brief, argued that the failure of the BIA to issue an opinion made it impossible for a reviewing court to determine whether the Alien received due process. The court, while joining its sister circuits in concluding that the BIA's streamlining procedures do not themselves violate an alien's right to due process, warming to Albathani's (the leading opinion on AWO, from the 1st Circuit) analogy of "one swallow does not make a summer", wanted tangible statistics before finding AWO improper. The 6th Circuit in this case said, "we will not assume a complete breakdown in the system in the absence of tangible evidence to support such a conclusion." For the original opinion, see below.


ILW.COM Focus

Registration Deadline Is Tuesday, December 9th For Admissibility, Removal, Financial Issues In Family Immigration Seminar

Tuesday, December 9th is the deadline to register for a discussion on Admissibility, Removal, Financial Issues In Family Immigration in our telephonic seminar series titled ""All In The Family" - Current Issues In Family-Based Immigration." The curriculum for the December 11th phone session is as follows:

  • Entry issues-245(i)
  • Arrests, inadmissibility-waivers
  • 3 and 10 year bar waivers
  • Removal Defense
  • New procedures for NTAs
  • Recent changes in enforcement practices
  • Affidavits of support
The deadline to register is Tuesday, December 9th. For more info, see: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/november2003.shtm. (Fax version: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/november2003.pdf.)


Featured Article

The Strict Rules Regarding Marriage Fraud
Christina B. LaBrie writes "US immigration law contains very strict provisions regarding fraudulent marriages."


Keep on top of the latest in immigration law! Attend ILW.COM seminars! You can attend ILW.COM phone seminars from the convenience of your office! For more info on the seminars currently available, please click here: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/

Immigration Law News

6th Circuit Finds AWO Constitutional, No Statistics To Show Breakdown In System
In Denko v. INS, No. 02-3746 (6th Cir. Dec. 8, 2003), the court said that the BIA's affirmance without opinion procedure (AWO) was constitutional and said that it would not assume a breakdown in the system absent tangible statistics that the AWO procedure caused the BIA to disregard its review responsibilities.

O Visa Denial Leads To Suspension Of Kidney Transplant Program
The American Medical News reports "Dr. Lal, originally from India, is one of a handful of foreign-born transplant surgeons in the US who have been denied work visas. So far no transplant programs have had to close permanently as a result, but Dr. Lal's employer in Akron, Ohio, was forced to suspend kidney transplants in July."

Walmart Suit Reflects Nation's Ambivalence About Immigration
A New York Times op-ed by an immigration attorney says "We really need to ask ourselves some tough questions. What do we want our immigration policy to be? What do we want from our employers? What do we owe those who work for a living? And last but very far from least, who should pay?"


Attorney listings on ILW.COM are searched 200,000 times/year! Each attorney listed is searched an average of once each day! Just one new client will pay for the entire year's fee! Click here for more info: http://www.ilw.com/membership/

Classifieds

Immigration Law Books
The successful practice of immigration law depends on having immigration statutes and regulations readily available. Immigration attorneys need look no further than Patel's complete reference library for their primary resource needs. Patel's library consists of (4) books: The Whole ACT—INA (Annotated), 20/22/28 CFRPlus, 8 CFRPlus, and Patel's Citations of Administrative Decisions under Immigration and Nationality Laws. Each book contains a detailed topical index, is annotated and is updated annually to reflect the latest changes in regulations. These four books constitute an indispensable library of primary resource materials for any immigration practitioner. For more information or to purchase these books see here.

We carry advertisements for Help Wanted: Attorney, Help Wanted: Paralegal, Help Wanted: Other, Positions Sought, Products & Services Offered, etc.
For information on advertising in the classifieds please click here

For a listing of current immigration events please click here
For services/products of use in your law practice please click here


Letters to the Editor

Dear Editor:
Andrea Wisner states in her letter to the editor, about the article "Never Fear: The Old H-1(b) Wage Rules Are Still In Effect," by Linda M. Keck, Esq., "stated that the employer must still pay the prevailing wage. That is misleading. The correct statement is that the employer must pay the "Required Wage," which is the greater of the "Prevailing Wage" and the "Actual Wage." Well, I'm afraid that if Ms. Wisner finds Ms. Keck's statement misleading, then I must confess that I find Ms. Wisner's statement downright confusing, and perhaps a misstatement. It has always been my understanding that the wage required to be paid by the H-1B employer is required to be not less than 5 percent below the prevailing wage in the geographic area, as determined by a wage survey. What is all this "Required Wage" needing to be the greater of the "Prevailing Wage" and the "Actual Wage"? It sounds like a story problem in math class. And why this dwelling on semantics and formulas? If a formula is to be used, perhaps we could write it this way: H-1BW = NLT-5%PW.

David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA

Dear Editor:
The following press release was submitted by the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service on available grants for support services for immigrants and refugees. http://www.ilw.com/immigrationdaily/News/2003,1209-lirs.shtm

Meg Arenberg
Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service


An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Send Correspondence and articles to editor@ilw.com. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. Opinions expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.

Editorial Advisory Board
Marc Ellis, Gary Endelman

© Copyright 1999-2003 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM


Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: