ILW.COM - the immigration portal Seminars

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Classifieds

RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

VIP Lawyer Network

CLE Seminars

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise

Services 4 LawFirms

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

EB-5

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

ilw.com VIP


The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.


Listserv Q&A for
"Solving Today's PERM Puzzle"

For more info, or to signup online, click here.
For more info, or to signup by fax, click here.

Question:

One of the panelists indicated that a PO Box for the employer may result in a denial. The employer registered with an address and then a PO Box on C. 2 Address Line #2. Since this is a pre- fill line on the Form 9089, should the employer revise their address or can they?

Should a paralegal be the user on the account or the attorney. One of the employers registered our paralegal as a user so that name is prefilled under attorney section. The form does allow you to change the name. Is this okay?

#A. 1. Regarding using the priority date from the previously filed labor certification. Our Romanian client has a son aging out in July, 2006, so we need to file the I-140 asap and thus the client is electing to file for PERM. He has a pending labor certification in Dallas and has returned the 45-day letter. We are assuming we answer the #A.1. "no" since the priority date is not an issue for Romania now. Would you agree?

Answer by Steven A. Clark:

1) Only employer can change this.

2) I recommend registering attorneys only for this reason.

Answer by Ron Klasko:

1) We would suggest revising the registration. The employer would have to do this.

2) Only the attorney should be listed as a user.

3) If the new filing is "identical", the answer should be "yes"; otherwise, "no."


Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: