|
Comment
Win-Win Idea Fails
Chicago Sun-Times comments "Hard to believe, but the U.S. Senate on Wednesday turned down a potential pool of 1 million new soldiers. They told them to forget about going to college, too. The message they sent was that our country doesn't need any more teachers, doctors, lawyers or soldiers. They might as well have said we want more dishwashers, maids and farm workers. Their decision means that fewer young immigrants will pay taxes and more will rely on public health care. Ultimately, there will be fewer young people contributing to the economy, building our brain trust."
We welcome readers to share their opinion by writing to weeklyeditor@ilw.com.
Classifieds
None this week
To place a classified ad that reaches our 15,000+ subscribers see here. To place an ad on our homepage that reaches our 100,000+ site visitors see here. To place an ad on thousands of pages across our website see here. To join ILW.COM Attorney Yellow Pages see here.
Items
Who Can Stay and Who Must Go: Keeping Families Together Under Current Immigration Law
Emily Haverkamp, Esq. writes "In movies or on TV, it always looks so simple when a U.S. citizen marries someone from a different country. The new husband or wife immediately gets U.S. citizenship or a green card, right? In real life, it is not quite so simple. The foreign national spouse can apply for a green card, but the process through which this occurs can differ greatly depending on the circumstances involved."
Immigrant's Weekly Poll: Should Legal Immigration To America Be Increased Or Decreased?
Make your vote count and find out what other Immigrant's Weekly readers think.
Immigrants Of The Week: Lenny Krayzelburg, Parminder Nagra, Charlize Theron, Lou Dobbs' Colleagues, And Sidney Poitier
Celebrate contributions of these outstanding immigrants to America.
News Links For The Week
These immigration news items are updated throughout the week.
Highlight
Law Offices of Curtis F. Pierce And Other Featured Law Firms
Letters
Readers are welcome to share their comments; send your letters to weeklyeditor@ilw.com.
Dear Weekly Editor:
You have intentionally combined legal immigration with
illegal immgration in your poll. You could not expect
a valid response or valid results because the issues
are so different. Why would immigration attorneys in
your organization intentionally blur the distinction
and benefits and problems?
How do you know that anti-immigration factions weighed
in any more than those factions in favor of the rule
of law in the U.S. - a lesson we stress with our
relations overseas?
Elise Patterson
Dear Weekly Editor:
I had to laugh at your complaint that some how anti-immigrants undermined your poll. You must live a very cloistered life. Every independent poll that I have seen on immigration shows that by an overwhelming majority most Americans are opposed to illegal immigration and want legal immigration reduced. A Gallup poll found that 80% of the public wants the federal government to get tougher on illegal Immigration. A Quinnipiac University Poll found that 62% oppose illegal aliens receiving citizenship, 72% oppose driver licenses for illegal aliens.
Your poll question, "Is immigration good for America," was a terrible question that was asked only to elicit a positive answer. It is like asking if vitamin C is good for you? Of course it is. Most experts say that about 800 milligrams a day are beneficial for your health, Unfortunately 8000 milligrams are toxic to your liver. The same is true regarding immigration. 800 legal immigrants per day are good for America. 8000 (legal and illegal), immigrants per day are toxic to our natural environment, our healthcare systems, public education, social order, the Rule of Law and the criminal justice systems.
The pro illegal alien lobby is willing to sell out our sovereignty, our children's future and our natural environment for cheap immigrant labor and the expansion of government programs.
Jim Ludwick
Dear Weekly Editor:
I am "for" immigration as per se. No country can live without an immigration regulation. What I cannot see is the process and the way each unit of Immigration
sees a case. Regulations should be so clear in some of the cases that the process can be speedy. However, at this point no matter what Immigration works
like the "crab climbing" Two steps up and three steps down making it an ever ending process. This should stop but when I do not know.
Gladys C. Farris
Discussions
Immigration Law Wiki
Illegal Mexican Exploitation
thats it,i have a disaster,its all over
HEADS UP: ILLEGAL-WORKER CRACKDOWN COMING
Divorce and Sponsor's obligation...please need hel...
How can love prevail over a 10 yr. bar?
There should be a distinction between immigrant an...
Senate Bills
Immigration and Divorce
CSS denied
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. © Copyright 1995-2007 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Correspondence to weeklyeditor@ilw.com. Letters may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium.
Attorney listings on ILW.COM are searched 200,000 times/year! Each attorney listed is searched an average of once each day! Just one new client will pay for the entire year's fee! Click here for more info: http://www.ilw.com/membership/
|