ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigrant's Weekly

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Classifieds

RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Find a lawyer

CLE Seminars

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise

Services 4 LawFirms

iPhone Apps

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

SpeedyScanning

EB-5

Buy/Sell Law Firms

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Find a Lawyer
State:

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:
EImmigration: Create & Manage Unlimited Forms & Cases, starting at $40/mo

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
I am writing to express concerns about Employer Information Bulletin 108 recently published by the Department of Home Land Security, particularly the section of "Permanent, Unrestricted Employment". I am asking immigration lawyers to take action and discuss this matter with the state agency. In this section, naturalize US citizens and citizens born in the US are defined as "foreign nationals." This categorization indicates dangerous thinking behind the policy. It is dangerous because it alienates American people and divides the diverse American population. It may lead to what happened to Japanese-Americans during WWII when they were confined to concentration camps. Japanese-Americans were denied personal justice simply because they were considered by the government as "Japanese nationals." But they were not Japanese nationals. They were born Americans, who were no different from other Americans whose great-grandpas were German, or British, or Irish. I urge Americans who want to uphold democracy and civil rights in this country to take action and show the state agency what is wrong with its definition and policy. We must point out that the agency's thinking about Americans who look different is politically wrong and dangerous. The Bulletin actually asks employers to do racial profiling (for example, when should an employer ask a person to show the passport or US birth certificate?). The agency must change the definition and the policy.

Concerned person



Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: