Here we go again. The Department of Justice announced on Monday, December
16, 2002 that Armenians would be subject to Special Registration along with
Saudis and Pakistanis, only to withdraw Armenia from this unholy list on
Wednesday, December 18, 2002.
Why did this sudden about-face happen? Writing in the Los Angeles
Times, columnist Steve Lopez says "It was all a mistake ... Or maybe
it wasn't a mistake. I can't tell, and the really frightening thing is that
the Justice Department can't seem to tell either." Why was Armenia put on
the list in the first place? Mr. Lopez continues "This might be a simple
case of someone in the Bush administration having flunked geography, and
thinking Armenia was a suburb of Tehran. Other possible explanations? This
was a wink and a nod to Turkey, a strategic ally that has a long history of
conflict with Armenia. Or some mid-level weasel decided it would look bad
to have only one other non-Muslim nation -- besides North Korea -- on the
Be the causes as they may, it appears unlikely that any terrorists would
hasten to register. Instead what appears to be happening is a round-up of
immigrants, many of whom have pending adjustment applications, but are
currently out of status. The unintended effect of such a round-up will
likely be that the government will lose in its Special Registration
initiative as more and more immigrants find out that attempting to comply
with the requirement is a one-way ticket to deportation. The immigrants who
decide not to register will also lose in that they will likely have to
abandon their applications for permanent residency and join the gray
underground where millions of undocumented immigrants toil in obscurity.
This looks like a lose-lose situation for all parties involved.
What's next? If the DOJ's Special Registration program continues down its
present course toward a quagmire, it is likely that the cries alleging
discrimination against Muslims and those of Arab origin will be heard at
the Department of Justice. What will likely follow is Special Registration
for everybody, all nationals from everywhere around the globe. When and if
that happens, we will be only a short step away from Special Registration
for all Americans and becoming a Nazi state.
200,000 Attorney Searches Per Year!
Approximately 200,000 searches are made each year for immigration attorneys on ILW.COM. That's almost 400 searches per year per attorney listed in our lawyer directory. Which means that if you are listed with ILW.COM, then your listing will be searched once each day throughout the year. You need only one client a year to make a profit on your listing! For a personal discussion on listing your practice in our directory, please send an e-mail with your phone number to email@example.com. Alternatively, if you prefer to list yourself on-line, please click here: http://www.ilw.com/membership/.
Department of Homeland Security Update: Part One
Jose Latour writes about the newly formed Department of Homeland Security.
Keep on top of the latest in immigration law! Attend ILW.COM seminars! You can attend ILW.COM phone seminars from the convenience of your office! For more info on the seminars currently available, please click here: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/
Immigration Law News
Comments Sought On HHS J-1 Program
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) sought comments on an interim final rule permiting institutions and health care
facilities to submit to HHS requests for waiver of the two-year home-
country physical presence requirement for physician exchange visitors
to deliver health care services in underserved areas.
DOS Speaks On Saudi Registration Requirement
Department of State Spokesman Boucher responded to a question posed on the Saudi Registration and said, "We're part of the process because we try to give out information overseas, we try to alert visa applicants to what to expect, we try to ensure compatibility between what we do and what the INS does and we share the information on applicants so that we can check whether people are telling us the same thing overseas as they tell us back here."
9/11 Victims Re-victimized In Legal Limbo
Northjersey.com reports "More than 200 spouses and children of foreigners
who died in the carnage of the World Trade Center live in a legal limbo
that prevents many of them from working, obtaining a driver's license, or
going to college."
INS Rounds Up Law Abiding Immigrants In Mistaken Drive Against Terrorists
Reporting on the round-up of immigrants who came to register with the INS,
Yahoo news quotes a protester "Terrorists most likely wouldn't come to the
INS to register."
Attorney listings on ILW.COM are searched 200,000 times/year! Each attorney listed is searched an average of once each day! Just one new client will pay for the entire year's fee! Click here for more info: http://www.ilw.com/membership/
Labor Certification Advertising
Are you satisfied with how you currently handle your labor certification advertising? Do you want to save time and reduce expenses and also eliminate the headaches of dealing with media ad reps, collection issues, tearsheets and other related documentation? Let ADNET handle the complete labor certification advertising process for you. You will receive the same unparalleled customer service whether you place one ad a year or thousands - leading immigration law firms and attorneys have solved their advertising problems by letting ADNET handle their labor certification advertising needs from beginning to end. Our dedicated staff consists of experienced professionals who are intimately familiar with the Department of Labors' requirements and restrictions with regard to: media selection, text abbreviations, deadlines, three-day consecutive runs, ad responses, tear-sheet urgency and matters arising from placement, follow-up, and documentation of labor certification ads. Based in New York City, ADNET is equipped to handle ad placement for any print media throughout the United States. For more information, please email us at: firstname.lastname@example.org or call us at: 212-587-3164.
We carry advertisements for Help Wanted: Attorney, Help Wanted: Paralegal, Help Wanted: Other, Positions Sought, Products & Services Offered, etc.
For information on advertising in the classifieds please click here
For a listing of current immigration events please click here
For services/products of use in your law practice please click here
Letters to the Editor
Your editorial in the December 17th issue of Immigration Daily which reports that Armenia
is included in the Justice Department registry list is incorrect. Please
see the corrected version of the federal register,
as well as our release below.
"The Armenian Assembly of America has been informed that the Federal Register mistakenly included the Republic of Armenia on a list of countries whose non-immigrant male nationals over the age 16 residing in the US must register with the US INS.
The Assembly has been assured that Armenia's name will be removed from this list as soon as possible.
"This is a very serious matter and we are relieved that the Administration is correcting the situation in an expeditious manner," Assembly Board of Directors Chairman Peter Vosbikian said.
The Armenian Assembly of America is the largest Washington-based nationwide organization promoting public understanding and awareness of Armenian issues. It is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt membership organization."
Please advise that you will print a correction in tomorrow's edition.
Joan Ablett, Director of Public Affairs
Armenian Assembly of America
Editor's Note: The Department of Justice announced on Monday, December
16, 2002 that Armenians would be subject to Special Registration along with
Saudis and Pakistanis, only to withdraw Armenia from this list on
Wednesday, December 18, 2002.
Please direct me to where I can find BIA case or directive regarding a family member who did not qualify because she did not have a qualifying member. Her parents were granted cancellation. I heard it was in your site and stated the BIA will hold in abeyance until parents are lprs and then she would qualify. I hope it's true. Please help.
Editor's Note: ILW.COM encourages you to utilize our newly improved search engine to find cases or other items of interest. The updated advanced search tool allows you to sort by cases, articles, or sitewide.
To the question of whether or not registered nurses are, or should be,
eligible for H-1B, it is quite fortunate that the Executive Associate
Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, INS, has spoken on the issue. In
a memo dated 11/27/02 directed to the Directors of the various Service
Centers, as well as the Director of the appeals unit, the memo clearly
states that critical care nurses can be shown to qualify as specialty
workers, entitled to H-1B visas.
Fortunately as well, it was not, as Attorney Murray suggested, necessary to
go to Federal District Court to pursue the position. Someone with better
understanding at INS, in Washington, finally understood and accepted the
obvious position espoused by our attorney for the last few years, that
critical care nurses require much more training than ward nurses and can
qualify for H-1B visas.
The next battle will be to get the visa screen removed as a requirement for
nurses. We should be placing as few obstacles as possible in the way of
RNs willing to come here and work, not setting unreasonable barriers in
their way. For example, the nurses must pass their CGFNS test and/or NCLEX
in English. This has been, when taken in conjunction with the TOEFL
examination, sufficient in the past to allow foreign nurses to enter. It
should be sufficient now with the critical need for nurses throughout our
As to why the Visa Screen is an unreasonable barrier, this is left to a
later letter. But make no mistake, the Test of Spoken English is used in
an unreasonable manner to keep nurses out. The amount of time taken by
CGFNS to process cases keeps nurses out. Despite the fact that the visa
screen rests in law, the decision to use it is political and policy. The
cost of the process keeps nurses out as well. It is not a reasonable
Occasionally well thought out positions, even if contrary to the general
consensus on an issue, prevail when put to the test. It is apparent, in
view of the position taken by the Executive Associate Commissioner in the
Office of Field Operations, that our attorney understood the law far better
than certain self-styled experts.
Brian E. Grutman, Executive Vice President
Pilot Employment Agency II, Inc.
It seems like when a study or a report agrees with our point of view, we call it "well written". When it doesn't, we say it was "out-of-context". To me, the following cited reports seem "well written".
In 1997, Donald L. Huddle, Professor Emeritus, Department of Economics, Rice University, published a report entitled: Public Costs of Immigration: Recent Net National Public Service Costs and Projected 1997-2006 Costs. In the conclusion he wrote: "Since 1992 annual net cost of immigration has risen from $42 billion to $65 billion."
George Borjas, in his book Heaven's Door published in 1999, is described as "Pforzheimer Professor of Public Policy at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research." He has said, as noted in Huddle's report, that "native workers who compete with immigrants lose about $133 billion yearly due to immigration whereas producers gain about $104 billion". This doesn't include the $65 billion discussed in the preceding paragraph.
The Urban Institute study of 1994, which Mr. Richard Baer cited as "favorable to immigration", is one of those "out-of-context' cases. As I said in my previous post, they were only able to reach that conclusion by excluding from their calculations, immigrants from Mexico, Cambodia, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, the former USSR, and Viet Nam (over 40% of the immigrant population at the time).
John H. Frecker
In response to the letter from Mr. Frecker, I am not sure about Maine but in Illinois I donít think undocumented immigrants can get welfare, anything other than emergency medical services, or subsidized housing. Anyone from Illinois out there that can confirm or dispute this? Just curious.
So I think that, at least in Illinois, the undocumented workers are making a few bucks an hour in jobs that I doubt Mr. Frecker would willingly perform, paying taxes (payroll taxes at least I think), and not getting much back from the Government for the taxes they pay.
To all of the undocumented folks out there. Some of us love ya! Remember, the Pilgrims didnít have I-94ís either. Lucky the native Americans didnít have an INS.
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice.
Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a
qualified attorney. Send Correspondence and articles to email@example.com. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. Opinions expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.