ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage


Immigration Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily September 17, 2004
Previous Issues
The unmatched news resource for legal professionals. Free! Join 15,000+ readers


DOJ Defends AWO

In response to mounting criticism of the BIA's AWO procedure from circuit courts, participants in the political process, and not least of all, Immigration Daily, the DOJ today issued a "fact sheet" on the Affirmance Without Opinion (AWO) procedure. We excerpt portions of this document below and offer some comments which should be of interest to all immigration attorneys, not merely to those who appear before the BIA.

  • "It is the rate of appeal (up from an historical 5 percent to close to 25 percent) that primarily accounts for the upsurge in petitions for review in the Federal circuit courts. For example, monthly petitions for review previously numbered about 125, but now range from 1,000 to 1,200 since the new procedures have taken effect. The Board's increased case completions account for a rise of about 200, and the remaining 800 to 1,000 new filings are due solely to the higher percentage of cases appealed."
    Our comment: attorneys may want to note that circuit court litigation is thus up eight-fold in the last two years and totals over 10,000 new cases per year. This bolsters our contention that removal related litigation is the only area of immigration law that has not experienced a downturn since the recession of a few years ago. Despite this, many large immigration law firms continue to focus solely on business immigration and have not added a significant litigation division. In light of these numbers, attorneys may want to think through the business implications thereof.
  • "Only about one-third of the Board's decisions fall into the category of AWO."
    Our comment: we believe this is a significant statement by the DOJ and may signal a small retreat from the AWO procedure in the near future.
  • "There is no evidence that the affirmance and reversal/remand rates of BIA decisions has changed significantly in the wake of the restructuring regulation ... A factor which may be contributing to the rise in the rate of appeals is the reduced time involved in completing cases appealed to the Board. Thus, for those aliens who wish to postpone deportation, filing an appeal to the circuit courts may be a much more attractive option than in the past. To the extent that the courts are routinely granting stays of deportation pending their review, the incentive to file an appeal and to request a stay will be high."
    Our comments: (1) the not-too-subtle suggestion by the DOJ that aliens take appeal purely to stay in the US longer is indicative of the "deport-em-all" mentality that we have decried. (2) the assertion that the affirmance and reversal remand rates have not changed does not alter the basic point that a procedure, where agency appellate review of a 500 page file is accomplished within a few minutes, must be fundamentally unfair. Is it humanly possible to adjudicate fairly in the circumstances that the Attorney General has created at the BIA? (3) we are sympathetic to the underlying problem for the EOIR/BIA here. The BIA has become a political football as a consequence of the evasion of hard policy decisions by the legislative branch. However, the plain fact remains that the net effect of AWO is to overload the circuit courts unreasonably. While we would be the last to belittle the importance of immigration in the American scene today, surely the proportion of immigration cases before our circuit courts should not be as large as it has become post-AWO. It is unfortunate that the so-called pro-immigration institutions have not considered the size of the federal judiciary's caseload a matter of importance to all. We urge observers of the federal judiciary to objectively examine the immigration caseload before our federal judges and render their considered opinion.
While we understand and commiserate with the unfortunate predicament of the BIA, we believe it bears part of the blame by continuing to uphold the AWO procedure in the face of its obvious weaknesses. However, we do believe that the final responsibility lies squarely with the Congress on this issue. We call upon Congress to do the right thing by undoing the disastrous 1996 amendments which have entrapped millions of immigrants in the 3/10 year bars. We realize that it is easy for us to criticize Congress on this matter and much harder for members of Congress to defend their votes on immigration matters. However, the nation's work must be done and we are confident that members of our legislative branch will not let America down.


Registration Deadline Is Tuesday, September 21st

Tuesday, September 21st is the deadline to register for "Sanctuary! Stratagems To Winning In Asylum Practice" - a three part (90 min each) telephonic seminar on cutting-edge issues in asylum law. The panelists include distinguished experts on asylum: Joseph A. Vail, Mark S. Davidson, Regina Germain, Nancy Kelly, Kirsten Schlenger, Mark Von Sternberg, Virgil Wiebe. For more info, detailed curriculum, speaker bios, and registration information, see: (Fax version:


Foreign Immigration And The Labor Force Of The U.S.: The Contributions Of New Foreign Immigration To The Growth Of The Nation's Labor Force And Its Employed Population, 2000 To 2004
Andrew Sum et al. of the Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University write "Foreign immigration into the US became one of the most powerful demographic, social, and economic forces in the nation over the past two decades, and substantial controversy over its impacts, both favorable and unfavorable, remains."

Keep on top of the latest in immigration law! Attend ILW.COM seminars! You can attend ILW.COM phone seminars from the convenience of your office! For more info on the seminars currently available, please click here:


EOIR Issues Fact Sheet On BIA's Restructuring Regulation
The Executive Office for Immigration Review issued a fact sheet on the BIA Streamlining's Regulation Procedures.

Is DOJ Owed Chevron Deference After Creation Of DHS?
In Lagandaon v. Ashcroft, No. 02-73216 (9th Cir. Sep. 9, 2004), the court in dicta raised the issue of whether Chevron deference is owed to the DOJ or the DHS subsequent to the creation of the DHS. Editor's Note: If no Chevron deference is owed to the DOJ, the Attorney General is likely to lose much current litigation.

Attorney listings on ILW.COM are searched 200,000 times/year! Each attorney listed is searched an average of once each day! Just one new client will pay for the entire year's fee! Click here for more info:


Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
The Law Office of Helga M. Carson, an established immigration firm in Palo Alto, California, is seeking an Associate Attorney with a minimum of one year experience in business immigration law. Applicants should be well organized and motivated. Excellent working environment and competitive benefits. For information about the firm, visit Email resume to Karen Chow-Gregory at or fax to (650) 326-9881.

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegals
Fast-paced, nationally recognized, Washington, D.C. immigration law firm seeks highly motivated, detail-oriented paralegals for challenging and exciting work in a congenial, supportive work environment. Immigration experience, strong organizational, writing & interpersonal skills required. Competitive salary/benefits and career advancement possibilities. Visit Send resume, writing sample, salary requirements + references to Amal Talhame at: No calls please.

Immigration Law Conferences
DHS has issued new Section 343 rules requiring foreign health care workers who are seeking temporary or permanent occupational visas or Trade NAFTA status to obtain a special visa certification in order to provide health care services in this country. The Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools (CGFNS)/International Commission on Healthcare Professions (ICHP) are sponsoring a special educational program in your community about the new DHS rules. The new federal DHS rules apply to: Registered nurses and licensed practical (vocational) nurses, Audiologists, Physical Therapists, Medical Technicians, Occupational Therapists, Medical Laboratory Technologists, Speech-Language Pathologists, Physician Assistants. Upcoming session locations include: Seattle, WA - Monday, Sept. 27, New York, NY - Monday, Oct. 4, San Francisco, CA - Monday, Oct. 18th, Atlanta, GA - Monday, Nov. 1st. To register, contact Marla Downing at:, (ph) 215-222-8454, x.242, or visit

We carry advertisements for Help Wanted: Attorney, Help Wanted: Paralegal, Help Wanted: Other, Positions Sought, Products & Services Offered, etc.
For information on advertising in the classifieds please click here

For services/products of use in your law practice please click here


Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: (300-words or fewer preferred).

Dear Editor:
Immigration attorneys as a group care not a bit about any American worker - you can see this by the shallow commentary offered by alleged "experts" in immigration law, who try and convince the disbelieving public that legalizing 10,000,000 law breakers will not erode the earning power of many Americans. Phooey. If you all truly believe that cheap foreign labor is so beneficial to the US, let's engage a "guest worker immigration attorney" program. Yes, let's import 5000 foreign immigration attorneys annually, cap their hourly billing rate at $25 per hour and sit back to hear the moaning and whining from immigration attorneys, who, remarkably, will likely then be far less supportive of those "guest workers."

A Concerned Citizen

Dear Editor:
You note that people can join together on a speakerphone to participate in ILW.COM seminars. I am wondering if we can sign up and have two locations via the sign up using a conference call technique? If so, I think I can gather together a group of about 8-10 attorneys who would probably sign up for most of your seminars.

Richard Breitman, Breitman Immigration Law Firm
Bloomington, MN

Editor's Note: Multiple people can join in on a seminar teleconference so long as all the individuals share one phone line. ILW.COM seminars charge per phone line, not per person. Also please note that instructions and materials are sent to only one email address per registration. We have no objection if the materials are shared by forwarding our emails to various listeners.


Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or less at no charge), email:

comingsNgoings To Date
Our new feature, Immigration Daily, comingsNgoings was launched in August. So far, we have received announcements for the following:

  • New Position
  • Honors And Awards
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • New Office Address
  • New Appointment
  • New Associate
  • New Partner
If you have a professional announcement (not limited to the above), that you wish to share with the Immigration Daily community, send your professional announcement to:

An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Send Correspondence and articles to Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. Opinions expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.

Publisher:  Sam Udani    Legal Editor:  Michele Kim

Editorial Advisory Board:   Marc Ellis, Gary Endelman

© Copyright 1999-2004 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM